An optimized set-up for helmet noninvasive ventilation improves pressure support delivery and patient-ventilator interaction

21Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To test the effects on mechanical performance of helmet noninvasive ventilation (NIV) of an optimized set-up concerning the ventilator settings, the ventilator circuit and the helmet itself. Subjects and methods: In a bench study, helmet NIV was applied to a physical model. Pressurization and depressurization rates and minute ventilation (MV) were measured under 24 conditions including pressure support of 10 or 20 cmH2O, positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 or 10 cmH2O, ventilator circuit with "high", "intermediate" or "low" resistance, and cushion deflated or inflated. In a clinical study pressurization and depressurization rates, MV and patient-ventilator interactions were compared in six patients with acute respiratory failure during conventional versus an "optimized" set-up (PEEP increased to 10 cmH2O, low resistance circuit and cushion inflated). Results: In the bench study, all adjustments simultaneously applied (increased PEEP, inflated cushion and low resistance circuit) increased pressurization rate (46.7 ± 2.8 vs. 28.3 ± 0.6 %, p < 0.05), depressurization rate (82.9 ± 1.9 vs. 59.8 ± 1.1 %, p ≤ 0.05) and patient MV (8.5 ± 3.2 vs. 7.4 ± 2.8 l/min, p < 0.05), and decreased leaks (17.4 ± 6.0 vs. 33.6 ± 6.0 %, p < 0.05) compared to the basal set-up. In the clinical study, the optimized set-up increased pressurization rate (51.0 ± 3.5 vs. 30.8 ± 6.9 %, p < 0.002), depressurization rate (48.2 ± 3.3 vs. 34.2 ± 4.6 %, p < 0.0001) and total MV (27.7 ± 7.0 vs. 24.6 ± 6.9 l/min, p < 0.02), and decreased ineffective efforts (3.5 ± 5.4 vs. 20.3 ± 12.4 %, p < 0.0001) and inspiratory delay (243 ± 109 vs. 461 ± 181 ms, p < 0.005). Conclusions: An optimized set-up for helmet NIV that limits device compliance and ventilator circuit resistance as much as possible is highly effective in improving pressure support delivery and patient-ventilator interaction. © 2012 Copyright jointly held by Springer and ESICM.

References Powered by Scopus

New treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: Noninvasive pressure support ventilation delivered by helmet - A pilot controlled trial

262Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A European survey of noninvasive ventilation practices

205Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bedside waveforms interpretation as a tool to identify patient-ventilator asynchronies

189Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Non-invasive ventilatory support and high-flow nasal oxygen as first-line treatment of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS

157Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure

145Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Physiological comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and helmet noninvasive ventilation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

134Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mojoli, F., Iotti, G. A., Currò, I., Pozzi, M., Via, G., Venti, A., & Braschi, A. (2013). An optimized set-up for helmet noninvasive ventilation improves pressure support delivery and patient-ventilator interaction. Intensive Care Medicine, 39(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2686-x

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

60%

Researcher 5

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 26

79%

Engineering 4

12%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

6%

Arts and Humanities 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0