Memory for spatial location is typically biased, with errors trending toward the center of a surrounding region. According to the category adjustment model (CAM), this bias reflects the optimal, Bayesian combination of fine-grained and categorical representations of a location. However, there is disagreement about whether categories are malleable. For instance, can categories be redefined based on expert-level conceptual knowledge? Furthermore, if expert knowledge is used, does it dominate other information sources, or is it used adaptively so as to minimize overall error, as predicted by a Bayesian framework? We address these questions using images of geological interest. The participants were experts in structural geology, organic chemistry, or English literature. Our data indicate that expertise-based categories influence estimates of location memory-particularly when these categories better constrain errors than alternative ("novice") categories. Results are discussed with respect to the CAM.
CITATION STYLE
Holden, M. P., Newcombe, N. S., Resnick, I., & Shipley, T. F. (2016). Seeing Like a Geologist: Bayesian Use of Expert Categories in Location Memory. Cognitive Science, 40(2), 440–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12229
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.