Responsible for responsibility? A study of digital e-health startups

29Citations
Citations of this article
129Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Responsible innovation (RI) has received increased attention from policymakers and academics as a solution to grand challenges and is viewed as the main driver for innovation. The United Nations has suggested 17 Sustainable Development Goals and responsible innovation can be seen as a tool that allows the movement of society towards reducing inequality, coping with environmental challenges and sustaining countries' economic and societal development. Our knowledge of how businesses act responsibly in solving these challenges is scarce. An inductive analysis of 14 e-health startups in Norway, shows that responsibility is highly prevalent. Entrepreneurs have instant contact with users (patients or healthcare professionals), which increases inclusiveness, anticipation and reflection as the main elements of responsibility. However, firms' contextual and strategic awareness of responsibility remains low, which means an absence of focused strategies to exercise responsibility. Consequently, entrepreneurial startups are prevented from reaching broader stakeholders and fully reflecting the knowledge obtained. Moreover, RI activities are often bundled with other activities on the "path" to successful commercialization. This paper contributes to and enriches the current RI understanding from a firm perspective and suggests some implications for practitioners as well as policymakers to enhance sustainable development in the healthcare sector.

References Powered by Scopus

Three approaches to qualitative content analysis

29525Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research

8342Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Five misunderstandings about case-study research

8104Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Sustainable entrepreneurship impact and entrepreneurial venture life cycle: A systematic literature review

93Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A comprehensive appraisal of responsible research and innovation: From roots to leaves

50Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Knowledge and innovation in start-up ventures: A systematic literature review and research agenda

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oftedal, E. M., Foss, L., & Iakovleva, T. (2019). Responsible for responsibility? A study of digital e-health startups. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195433

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 42

68%

Researcher 8

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 26

52%

Social Sciences 12

24%

Computer Science 6

12%

Engineering 6

12%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 45

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0