Skip to main content
Book ChapterOPEN ACCESS

Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling versus vitrectomy with no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (FTMH)

  • Spiteri Cornish K
  • Lois N
  • Scott N
  • et al.
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, (2011)
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009306
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This is the protocol for a review and there is no abstract. The objectives are as follows:To determine whether ILM peeling improves anatomical and functional outcomes of macular hole surgery when compared with no peeling and to investigate the impact of different parameters such as presenting vision, stage/size of the hole and duration of symptoms in the success of the surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spiteri Cornish, K., Lois, N., Scott, N., Burr, J., Cook, J., Boachie, C., … Kwok, A. (2011). Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling versus vitrectomy with no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (FTMH). In Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009306

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free