Voluntary is better than involuntary cough peak flow for predicting re-intubation after scheduled extubation in cooperative subjects

30Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study, we compared the predictive accuracy of voluntary cough peak flow (V-CPF) and involuntary cough peak flow (IV-CPF) for re-intubation in mechanically ventilated subjects. METHODS: Endotracheally intubated patients who passed a spontaneous breathing trial and assessment of readiness for extubation were enrolled. Before extubation, V-CPF and IV-CPF were measured. Re-intubation was recorded at 72 h after extubation. RESULTS: A total of 115 extubations in 106 cooperative subjects (including 9 subjects with second extubation) and 5 extubations in 5 uncooperative subjects were recorded. At 72 h, 20 (17.4%) and 1 (25%) instances of re-intubation occurred in cooperative and uncooperative subjects, respectively. In cooperative subjects, those who had been successfully extubated had higher V-CPF than re-intubated subjects (81.3 ± 41.4 vs 51.3 ± 31.7, P =.003). However, rates were not significantly different with IV-CPF (70.9 ± 39.8 vs 55.7 ± 37.9, P =.121). Areas under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic in V-CPF and IV-CPF were 0.743 ± 0.057 and 0.632 ± 0.069 (P 99.0 L/min, respectively), V-CPF was higher than IV-CPF (82.1 ± 9.6 vs 66.6 ± 19.5 L/min, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duan, J., Liu, J., Xiao, M., Yang, X., Wu, J., & Zhou, L. (2014). Voluntary is better than involuntary cough peak flow for predicting re-intubation after scheduled extubation in cooperative subjects. Respiratory Care, 59(11), 1643–1651. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.03045

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free