Do economic values and expenditures for viewing waterfowl in the U.S. differ among species?

6Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many economic studies value birdwatching in general and often do not account for potential differences in viewers’ benefits from observing different species. But, how different are economic values of viewing various bird species? To answer that question, we surveyed Ducks Unlimited (DU) members using an online questionnaire to estimate trip expenditures and consumer surplus per trip for viewing pintail ducks, waterfowl in general, and other species of waterfowl. Expenditures per trip were USD $231, $199, and $182, respectively. Consumer surpluses per trip, estimated using the contingent valuation method, were $28, $32, and $29, respectively. Neither expenditures nor consumer surplus were statistically different among species for DU members who are adept at species differentiation. Our results suggest that it may be reasonable to use a general economic value for waterfowl viewing when formulating management alternatives for a variety of waterfowl.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Loomis, J., Haefele, M., Dubovsky, J., Lien, A. M., Thogmartin, W. E., Diffendorfer, J., … Merideth, R. (2018, November 2). Do economic values and expenditures for viewing waterfowl in the U.S. differ among species? Human Dimensions of Wildlife. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2018.1496371

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free