Attachment and the archive: Barriers and facilitators to the use of historical sociology as complementary developmental science

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article explores historical sociology as a complementary source of knowledge for scientific research, considering barriers and facilitators to this work through reflections on one project. This project began as a study of the emergence and reception of the infant disorganized attachment classification, introduced in the 1980s by Ainsworth's student Mary Main, working with Judith Solomon. Elsewhere I have reported on the findings of collaborative work with attachment researchers, without giving full details of how this came about. Here, I will offer personal reflections arising from the process, and my work in what Hasok Chang has called history as complementary science.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Duschinsky, R. (2019). Attachment and the archive: Barriers and facilitators to the use of historical sociology as complementary developmental science. Science in Context, 32(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889719000243

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free