Relative motion: Kinetic information for the order of depth at an edge

62Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A new source of kinetic information for depth at an edge was investigated with adult subjects. The relationship between the motion of optical texture, indicating a surface, and the motion of a contour, indicating an edge, determines whether the surface is perceived as occluding or occluded. Subjects viewed computer-generated random-lot displays in which this relative-motion information provided the only information for depth order and a second type of display in which order in depth was specified both by relative-motion information and by the accretion and deletion of texture. Reliable depth effects were obtained in both conditions. These results indicate that adults are sensitive to the relative motion of texture and contour as information for depth at an edge. © 1987 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

The change from visible to invisible:

183Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Kinetic disruption of optical texture: The perception of depth at an edge

180Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Infants' sensitivity to accretion and deletion of texture as information for depth at an edge.

55Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Figure and ground in the visual cortex: V2 combines stereoscopic cues with Gestalt rules

220Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How we avoid collisions with stationary and moving obstacles

170Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Subjective contours - bridging the gap between psychophysics and physiology

164Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yonas, A., Craton, L. G., & Thompson, W. B. (1987). Relative motion: Kinetic information for the order of depth at an edge. Perception & Psychophysics, 41(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208213

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

42%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

38%

Researcher 4

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 17

71%

Computer Science 3

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

8%

Neuroscience 2

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free