Introduction: Concepts related to end-of-life decisions, such as euthanasia, palliative care, advance directives and therapeutic obstinacy, are poorly understood by the general population, which, when facing a terminal situation, is not prepared to choose the best option. Objective: Pilot study (n = 544) to find out what the open population understands about terms used in end-of-life situations in four cities of the Mexican Republic. Method: Survey via Internet with 18 questions about different terms. It was a descriptive, cross-sectional study. Statistical analysis was carried out. Results: People older than 18 years who were not engaged in health-related professional activities were selected. Conclusions: Most terms related to end-of-life decisions were found not to be interesting to or understood by a part of the population. The least recognized term was therapeutic obstinacy (62.8%), and the most widely known, palliative care (91%); there was confusion between the terms euthanasia and assisted suicide (47.8%). Age and education level had more influence in the results, than other demographic variables.
CITATION STYLE
Pichardo-García, L. M. G., Casas-Martínez, M. de la L. L., Jaimes-Palomera, M., Sotelo-Méndez, A. G., Sosa-Delgado, A. P., Quintero-Luna, A., … Aguilar-Júarez, J. A. (2019). Encuesta en población abierta respecto a términos relacionados con decisiones al final de la vida. Gaceta Medica de Mexico, 155(2), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.24875/gmm.19004465
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.