Encuesta en población abierta respecto a términos relacionados con decisiones al final de la vida

1Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Concepts related to end-of-life decisions, such as euthanasia, palliative care, advance directives and therapeutic obstinacy, are poorly understood by the general population, which, when facing a terminal situation, is not prepared to choose the best option. Objective: Pilot study (n = 544) to find out what the open population understands about terms used in end-of-life situations in four cities of the Mexican Republic. Method: Survey via Internet with 18 questions about different terms. It was a descriptive, cross-sectional study. Statistical analysis was carried out. Results: People older than 18 years who were not engaged in health-related professional activities were selected. Conclusions: Most terms related to end-of-life decisions were found not to be interesting to or understood by a part of the population. The least recognized term was therapeutic obstinacy (62.8%), and the most widely known, palliative care (91%); there was confusion between the terms euthanasia and assisted suicide (47.8%). Age and education level had more influence in the results, than other demographic variables.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pichardo-García, L. M. G., Casas-Martínez, M. de la L. L., Jaimes-Palomera, M., Sotelo-Méndez, A. G., Sosa-Delgado, A. P., Quintero-Luna, A., … Aguilar-Júarez, J. A. (2019). Encuesta en población abierta respecto a términos relacionados con decisiones al final de la vida. Gaceta Medica de Mexico, 155(2), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.24875/gmm.19004465

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free