Objective: Prospective-comparative study between pseudarthrosis and bone fusion in lumbar stenosis Methods: 38 patients operated on for lumbar spinal stenosis and submitted to arthrodesis were evaluated by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Radiographs were requested to evaluate spinal fusion. Results: An effective improvement was observed between the preoperative period and one year after the operation, in relation to VAS, both in the group that received a bone fusion and in the group with pseudarthrosis. With regard to the Roland Morris questionnaire, there was a tendency towards an improvement in the bone fusion group and a significant improvement in the pseudarthrosis group. Conclusion: There was no difference between the groups (bone fusion and pseudarthrosis) in relation to pain and disability. Level of Evidence: Level II, longitudinal prospective study.
CITATION STYLE
Rodrigues, L. M. R., Ueno, F. H., Fujiki, E. N., & Milani, C. (2011). Estudo prospectivo comparativo entre pseudoartrose e fusão óssea na estenose de canal lombar. Acta Ortopedica Brasileira, 19(3), 159–162. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-78522011000300009
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.