Long-term clinical outcome and MIBI SPECT parameters in percutaneous coronary interventions

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and Aim Primary percutaneous coronary inter- vention (PCI) is the preferred treatment option for acute myocardial infarction (MI). Off-site PCI reduces time-to- treatment, which could potentially lead to enhanced clinical outcomes. Therefore, we investigated whether off-site PCI improves 5-year clinical outcomes compared with on-site PCI and whether this is related to in-hospital 99mTc-sestamibi single photon emission computed tomography (MIBI SPECT) parameters. Methods We describe the 5-year follow-up for a combined endpoint of death or re-infarction in 128 patients with acute MI who were randomly assigned to undergo primary PCI at the off-site centre (n=68) or to transferral to an on-site centre (n=60). Three days after PCI, MIBI SPECT was performed to estimate infarct size. A multivariate Cox regression model was created to study the relation between MIBI SPECT parameters and long-term clinical outcomes. Results After a mean follow-up of 5.8±1.1 years, 25 events occurred. Off-site PCI significantly reduced door-to-balloon time compared with on-site PCI (94±54 versus 125± 59 min, p=0.003). However, infarct size (17±15 versus 14±12%, p=0.34) and 5-year death or infarct rate (21% versus 18%, p=0.75) were comparable between treatment centres. With multivariate analysis, only Killip class ≥2 and Q wave MI, but not scintigraphic data, predicted long-term clinical outcomes. Conclusion Off-site PCI reduced door-to-balloon time with a comparable 5-year death or infarct rate. Parameters from resting MIBI SPECT on day 3 after MI did not predict long-term clinical outcomes. © The Author(s) 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Mulder, M., van der Zant, F. M., Knaapen, P., Cornel, J. H., & Umans, V. A. W. M. (2011). Long-term clinical outcome and MIBI SPECT parameters in percutaneous coronary interventions. Netherlands Heart Journal, 19(2), 68–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-011-0075-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free