Liturgical Philosophy of Religion: An Untimely Manifesto about Sincerity, Acceptance, and Hope

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This loosely-argued manifesto contains some suggestions regarding what the philosophy of religion might become in the twenty-first century. It was written for a brainstorming workshop over a decade ago, and some of the recommendations and predictions it contains have already been partly actualized (that’s why it is now a bit “untimely”). The goal is to sketch three aspects of a salutary “liturgical turn” in philosophy of religion. (Note: “liturgy” here refers very broadly to communal religious service and experience generally, not anything specifically “high church.”) The first involves the attitudes that characterize what I call the “liturgical stance” towards various doctrines. The second focuses on the “vested” propositional objects of those attitudes. The third looks at how those doctrines are represented, evoked, and embodied in liturgical contexts. My untimely rallying-cry is that younger philosophers of religion might do well to set aside debates regarding knowledge and justified belief, just as their elders set aside debates regarding religious language. When we set aside knowledge in this way, we make room for discussions of faith that in turn shed light on neglected but philosophically-interesting aspects of lived religious practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chignell, A. (2021). Liturgical Philosophy of Religion: An Untimely Manifesto about Sincerity, Acceptance, and Hope. In Boston Studies in Philosophy, Religion and Public Life (Vol. 8, pp. 73–94). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44606-2_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free