A Comparative Safety Analysis of Medicines Based on the UK Pharmacovigilance and General Practice Prescribing Data in England

7Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aim: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a major concern leading to significant increases in both morbidity and mortality globally. Providing healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients with real-world data on drug safety is imperative to facilitate informed decision-making. The study aimed to determine the feasibility of creating comparative safety charts for medicines by mapping ADR reporting onto prescribing data. Materials and Methods: Data on serious and fatal ADR reports from the Yellow Card database was mapped onto general practice prescription data in England. The rate of serious and fatal ADR reports per million items prescribed was calculated for commonly-prescribed medicines. Results: Quantitative comparative analyses for 137 medicines belonging to 26 therapeutic classes were conducted. Significant differences were observed within most therapeutic classes for the rate of serious and fatal ADR reports per prescribing unit. Conclusion: Despite the limitations of ADR reporting and prescribing databases, the study provides a proof-of-concept for the feasibility of mapping ADR reporting onto prescribing data to create comparative safety charts that could support evidence-based decision-making around formulary choices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mokbel, K., Daniels, R., Weedon, M. N., & Jackson, L. (2022). A Comparative Safety Analysis of Medicines Based on the UK Pharmacovigilance and General Practice Prescribing Data in England. In Vivo, 36(2), 780–800. https://doi.org/10.21873/INVIVO.12765

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free