Equality of Educational Opportunity A 40 Year Retrospective

  • Gamoran A
  • Long D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
180Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Equality of Educational Opportunity, the 1966 landmark study by James Coleman and colleagues, persists as a seminal source and stimulus to continuing research on schools and student achievement. Three main findings of the Coleman report are still evident in the U.S. today. In 1966, U.S. schools were highly segregated by race. Following marked reductions in racial isolation during the 1970s and 1980s, segregation increased during the 1990s, and on some indicators, levels of segregation are nearly as high today as they were in 1966 in most of the country. Only in the south is contemporary desegregation markedly lower than it was in 1966. Black-white achievement gaps are smaller today than they were during the time of the Coleman report, although they are no smaller today than they were in 1990, and they remain substantial. Coleman’s most controversial finding, that variation in achievement is more closely tied to family background than to school resources, has stood the test of time. However, later studies have noted that significant portions of within-school achievement variation is due to schooling, through mechanisms such as tracking and teacher effects. Moreover, despite recent claims to the contrary, achievement in countries with very low per capita incomes is more sensitive to the availability of school resources. An emphasis on achievement testing in current U.S. education policy means that the research legacy of the Coleman report is as important as ever.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gamoran, A., & Long, D. A. (2007). Equality of Educational Opportunity A 40 Year Retrospective. In International Studies in Educational Inequality, Theory and Policy (pp. 23–47). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5916-2_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free