Novel axial compressive endoprosthesis ACE can enhance metaphyseal fixation and facilitate osseointegration: A biomechanical study

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Metaphyseal fixation for endoprosthetic reconstruction after bone tumor resection is difficult due to the short residual bone length and reverse funnel shape of the metaphysis. In the current study, 3D-printed axial compressive endoprosthesis (ACE) with a short stem and intramedullary axial compressive mechanism is proposed to improve metaphyseal fixation. The rationales of ACE are that 1) intramedullary axial compress enhances the stability of endoprosthesis and facilitates bone ingrowth at the osteotomy site; 2) 3D printed porous metallic surface at osteotomy surface and stem allows bone ingrowth to achieve osseointegration. Methods: A biomechanical study was performed to explore the initial stability using Sawbones. A diaphysis and metaphyseal segmental defect were created and four fixation structures were simulated: 1) ACE; 2) ACE + lateral plate; 3) stem prosthesis + unilateral plate; 4) stem prosthesis + bilateral plates. Bending and torsional stiffness were determined with a material testing machine. The relationship between the torque of the compression nut and the axial compression force of the bone-implant surface was measured using a round gasket load sensor. Results: ACE + lateral plate was the stiffest in the bending test (sagittal 324.3 ± 110.8 N/mm, coronal 307.7 ± 8.7 N/mm). ACE + lateral plate and stem prosthesis + bilateral plates had the highest torsional stiffness (10.9 ± 1.3 Nm/° and 10.7 ± 0.2 Nm/° respectively). The bending stiffness of ACE was equivalent to stem prosthesis + bilateral plates (sagittal 196 ± 10 N/mm vs. 200 ± 7 N/mm, coronal 197 ± 14 N/mm vs. 209 ± 3 N/mm), but the torsional stiffness of ACE was inferior to stem prosthesis + bilateral plates (6.1 ± 1.3 Nm/° vs. 10.7 ± 0.2 Nm/°). Stem prosthesis + unilateral plate was the least stiff both in bending and torsion. The relationship between torque (T/Nm) and axial pressure (F/N) was F = 233.5T. Conclusion: The axial compressive design of ACE enhances primary stability and facilitates osseointegration, which provides an alternative option of metaphyseal fixation for endoprosthetic reconstruction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, S., Ji, T., Tang, X., & Guo, W. (2022). Novel axial compressive endoprosthesis ACE can enhance metaphyseal fixation and facilitate osseointegration: A biomechanical study. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1004849

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free