Criminal responsibility for robots: A thorough and comparative study

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The tremendous acceleration in manufacturing technology, on one hand, and artificial intelligence programs, on the other, have produced a new organism whose legal frameworks have yet to be defined, robots, the combination of human intelligence, and machine power. It is unclear what this new age will look like in its place in the Criminal Code, even after the European Parliament passed the 2017 European Guidelines for Civil Law. However, the latter has hinted that a new legal person is on the horizon, which may entail legal responsibility, and it goes without saying that the Civil Code is not far from its criminal counterpart, since tort is itself criminal responsibility, if the offending legal text is Criminal nature. Research into the availability of the legal implications of robots is a cornerstone in the possibility of criminal accountability. In the absence of a national or comparative legislative organization for humanity, jurisprudence is called to discuss the limits on which the criminal responsibility of this new entity stands, which may result in the creation of a new type of criminal responsibility that has a special legal nature, commensurate with the privacy it enjoys, provided that it is adopted. The activity of the latter is through its.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moneim Elsherif, M. S. A. (2021). Criminal responsibility for robots: A thorough and comparative study. Arab Journal of Forensic Sciences and Forensic Medicine, 3(1), 140–159. https://doi.org/10.26735/ECMW8027

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free