Patients' positive and negative responses to reading mental health clinical notes online

32Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: This study describes responses to OpenNotes, clinical notes available online, among patients receivingmental health care and explores whether responses vary by patient demographic or clinical characteristics. Methods: Survey data from 178 veterans receiving mental health treatment at a large Veterans Affairs medical center included patient-reported health self-efficacy, health knowledge, alliance with clinicians, and negative emotional responses after reading OpenNotes. Health care data were extracted from the patient care database. Results: Reading OpenNotes helped many participants feel in control of their health care (49%) and have more trust in clinicians (45%), although a few (8%) frequently felt upset after reading their notes. In multivariate models, posttraumatic stress disorderwas associatedwith increased patient-clinician alliance (p5.046) but also with negative emotional responses (p,<01). Conclusions: Patients receivingmental health care frequently reported benefits from reading OpenNotes, yet some experienced negative responses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Denneson, L. M., Chen, J. I., Pisciotta, M., Tuepker, A., & Dobscha, S. K. (2018). Patients’ positive and negative responses to reading mental health clinical notes online. Psychiatric Services, 69(5), 593–596. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201700353

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free