Debating the Death of Deviance Transgressing Extremes in Conspiracy Narratives

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In recent years the sociology of deviance has been marked by an ongoing, lively and emergent intellectual debate. The parameters of the competing arguments are both conceptual (Best, 2004a, 2004b, 2006; Goode, 2006) and ideological (Hendershott, 2002; Sumner, 1994), reflecting shifting contemporary theoretical concerns (Adler and Adler, 2006; Dotter, 2002). Questions regarding the intellectual coherence of the field (Goode, 2004a), its present-day relevance (Goode, 2004b) and even of its “death” (Goode, 2002, 2003, 2004a; Sumner, 1994) have been taken up by scholars, creating a terrain no less fertile than that represented by the growth of interactionist theories in the 1960s and 1970s (Becker, 1973 [1963], 1964, 1967).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dotter, D. (2014). Debating the Death of Deviance Transgressing Extremes in Conspiracy Narratives. In Critical Criminological Perspectives (pp. 127–151). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137303806_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free