Lean maturity assessment in eto scenario

11Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The obligatory path towards a lean manufacturing organization requires assessment and monitoring. However, a lean assessment framework is not yet available for the engineer to order (ETO) scenario. This work explored ten lean ETO maturity principles—identified from the literature—that take insight from three formally defined sets (Toyota Way, lean construction, and lean product development principles). A practical assessment model was proposed based on the evaluation of ten lean ETO objective criteria (four with mathematical formulation) and was validated on a real industrial case. A problem‐solving tool, including a new lean tool, called the Problem Focus Matrix (PFM), was also presented; this tool was aimed toward development of an integrated framework that would include the organization mission, management, and continuous improvement.

References Powered by Scopus

Intelligent Manufacturing in the Context of Industry 4.0: A Review

2166Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Toyota production system and kanban system materialization of just-in-time and respect-for-human system

985Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Lean manufacturing: Literature review and research issues

700Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Toward a sustainable educational engineer archetype through Industry 4.0

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring the Construction Project Resilience from the Perspective of Employee Behaviors

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A framework for flexible and reconfigurable vision inspection systems

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chiera, M., Lupi, F., Rossi, A., & Lanzetta, M. (2021). Lean maturity assessment in eto scenario. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093833

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

68%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

12%

Researcher 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 23

70%

Business, Management and Accounting 6

18%

Computer Science 2

6%

Social Sciences 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free