Rules warp feature encoding in decision-making circuits

14Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We have the capacity to follow arbitrary stimulus-response rules, meaning simple policies that guide our behavior. Rule identity is broadly encoded across decision-making circuits, but there are less data on how rules shape the computations that lead to choices. One idea is that rules could simplify these computations. When we follow a rule, there is no need to encode or compute information that is irrelevant to the current rule, which could reduce the metabolic or energetic demands of decision-making. However, it is not clear if the brain can actually take advantage of this computational simplicity. To test this idea, we recorded from neurons in 3 regions linked to decision-making, the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), ventral striatum (VS), and dorsal striatum (DS), while macaques performed a rule-based decision-making task. Rule-based decisions were identified via modeling rules as the latent causes of decisions. This left us with a set of physically identical choices that maximized reward and information, but could not be explained by simple stimulus-response rules. Contrasting rule-based choices with these residual choices revealed that following rules (1) decreased the energetic cost of decision-making; and (2) expanded rule-relevant coding dimensions and compressed rule-irrelevant ones. Together, these results suggest that we use rules, in part, because they reduce the costs of decision-making through a distributed representational warping in decision-making circuits.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Becket Ebitz, R., Tu, J. C., & Hayden, B. Y. (2020). Rules warp feature encoding in decision-making circuits. PLoS Biology, 18(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000951

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 28

64%

Researcher 10

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 29

71%

Psychology 6

15%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

10%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free