Contrasting Materialisms: Engelsian Dialectical and Bunge’s Emergentist Realism

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Despite the fact that dialectical materialism (hereafter DM) raises little interest from contemporary philosophers, Mario Bunge has provided a thorough criticism of DM. This ontology has some merits, being evolutionist (material things change by themselves) and scientific. But the specific ‘dialectic laws’ for material processes, as viewed by Bunge, are at best vague and of limited scope, and at worst incompatible with materialism, or plainly unintelligible. This analysis can be developed by considering the original dialectic laws in Engels’ writings, and also the criticisms and tentative revisions of DM by proponents of dialectics themselves. In this respect, the little-known work of Robert Havemann must be taken into account. This Marxist scientist and philosopher was a severe critic of dogmatic DM and a strong supporter of the scientific method. Nevertheless, he was unable to escape some of the worst obscurities of dialectical thinking. The existence of a modern emergentist, exact and scientist philosophical materialism, exemplified by the clear and large-scoped Bungean synthesis, now makes any excessive concern for DM notions a superfluous, if not even detrimental, intellectual detour.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Deleporte, P. (2019). Contrasting Materialisms: Engelsian Dialectical and Bunge’s Emergentist Realism. In Mario Bunge: A Centenary Festschrift (pp. 101–116). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16673-1_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free