Are reward polymorphisms subject to frequency- and density-dependent selection? Evidence from a monoecious species pollinated by deceit

33Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Most deceit-pollinated species involve floral dimorphisms characterized by the presence of rewarding male flowers and nonrewarding female flowers. It has been proposed that this polymorphism establishes the conditions for the action of frequency dependent selection (FDS). The tendency of foraging animals to aggregate in areas of high resource density suggests that pollination efficiency and fruit production may be positively influenced by flower density (density dependent selection, DDS). In this paper we offer a graphical model describing the effects of FDS and DDS on a monoecious species pollinated by deceit. We test the FDS and DDS assumptions and the predictions of the model using field observations and experimental populations of Begonia gracilis in which population sex ratio and flower density were controlled. We found a marked effect of both FDS and DDS on pollinator visitation, fruit-set, and on the probability of female flowers to setting fruits. We conclude that these two types of selection have had a strong influence on the evolution of deceit-pollinated species.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Castillo, R. A., Cordero, C., & Domínguez, C. A. (2002). Are reward polymorphisms subject to frequency- and density-dependent selection? Evidence from a monoecious species pollinated by deceit. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 15(4), 544–552. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00425.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free