Ot-equator® attachments comparison for retaining an early loaded implant overdenture on two or three implants: 1 year rct preliminary data

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this multicenter randomized controlled trial was to compare the clinical, radiographic, and patient-centered outcomes of early loaded mandibular overdentures deliberately placed on two or three implants. The outcomes were: implant and prosthesis success and survival rates; biological and technical complications; marginal bone loss; patient satisfaction; and periodontal parameters. The results showed no differences between the groups in any of the outcomes analyzed. With the limitations of the present study, and looking at long-term follow-up, the gold standard of prosthetic rehabilitations with attachments, in agreement with the scientific community, should prefer two non-splinted implants.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tallarico, M., Cervino, G., Montanari, M., Scrascia, R., Ferrari, E., Casucci, A., … Cicciù, M. (2021, September 1). Ot-equator® attachments comparison for retaining an early loaded implant overdenture on two or three implants: 1 year rct preliminary data. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188601

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free