Standard versus accelerated initiation of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury (STARRT-AKI): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

86Citations
Citations of this article
125Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury is a common and devastating complication of critical illness, for which renal replacement therapy is frequently needed to manage severe cases. While a recent systematic review suggested that " earlier" initiation of renal replacement therapy improves survival, completed trials are limited due to small size, single-centre status, and use of variable definitions to define " early" renal replacement therapy initiation.Methods/design: This is an open-label pilot randomized controlled trial. One hundred critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury will be randomly allocated 1:1 to receive " accelerated" initiation of renal replacement therapy or " standard" initiation at 12 centers across Canada. In the accelerated arm, participants will have a venous catheter placed and renal replacement therapy will be initiated within 12 hours of fulfilling eligibility. In the standard initiation arm, participants will be monitored over 7 days to identify indications for renal replacement therapy. For participants in the standard arm with persistent acute kidney injury, defined as a serum creatinine not declining >50% from the value at the time of eligibility, the initiation of RRT will be discouraged unless one or more of the following criteria are fulfilled: serum potassium ≥6.0 mmol/L; serum bicarbonate ≤10 mmol/L; severe respiratory failure (PaO2/FiO2<200) or persisting acute kidney injury for ≥72 hours after fulfilling eligibility. The inclusion criteria are designed to identify a population of critically ill adults with severe acute kidney injury who are likely to need renal replacement therapy during their hospitalization, but not immediately. The primary outcome is protocol adherence (>90%). Secondary outcomes include measures of feasibility (proportion of eligible patients enrolled in the trial, proportion of enrolled patients followed to 90 days for assessment of vital status and the need for renal replacement therapy) and safety (occurrence of adverse events).Discussion: The optimal timing of renal replacement therapy initiation in patients with severe acute kidney injury remains uncertain, representing an important knowledge gap and a priority for high-quality research. This pilot trial is necessary to establish protocol feasibility, confirm the safety of participants and obtain estimated events rates for design of a large definitive trial. Trial registration number: NCT01557361. © 2013 Smith et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure

8480Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Acute renal failure in critically ill patients: A multinational, multicenter study

3611Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) as a biomarker for acute renal injury after cardiac surgery

2123Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Acute kidney injury

1229Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Acute kidney injury from sepsis: current concepts, epidemiology, pathophysiology, prevention and treatment

876Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Initiation strategies for renal-replacement therapy in the intensive care unit

839Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, O. M., Wald, R., Adhikari, N. K. J., Pope, K., Weir, M. A., & Bagshaw, S. M. (2013). Standard versus accelerated initiation of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury (STARRT-AKI): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-320

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 50

68%

Researcher 18

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

4%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 66

86%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

6%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 3

4%

Engineering 3

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free