Comparison between 3D and 2D cephalometric analyses

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper presented 3D cephalometric analysis on DICOM data from I-CAT CT cone-beam machine consisted of averages and standard deviations from 20 Thai males from 19 to 70 year (average 33.53 ± 14.08 year) and 20 Thai females from 16 to 70 year (average 32.60 ± 15.37 year). The angular measurements consisted of 49 lateral and 9 frontal measurements while linear measurements consisted of 29 lateral, 3 frontal, and 8 perpendicular measurements. Results in 3D were compared with the corresponding 2D results showing that most midline-to-midline linear measurements and some midline-to-midline angular measurements were not different, while other types of measurements were significantly different. The 3D results will be used in the clinical Ceph3D services as requested by those with interests on cephalometric analysis and anthropology with focus on Thai subjects while the 2D results will be used for comparison with cephalometric analyses from other orthodontists. © 2008 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bholsithi, W., Sinthanayothin, C., Chintakanon, K., Komolpis, R., & Tharanon, W. (2008). Comparison between 3D and 2D cephalometric analyses. In IFMBE Proceedings (Vol. 21 IFMBE, pp. 540–543). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69139-6_135

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free