Concordance between the zinc sulphate flotation and centrifugal sedimentation methods for the diagnosis of intestinal parasites

10Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: The diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections depends on the parasite load, the specific gravity density of the parasite eggs, oocysts or cysts, and the density and viscosity of flotation or sedimentation medium where faeces are processed. Objective: To evaluate the concordance between zinc sulphate flotation and centrifugal sedimentation in the recovery of parasites in faecal samples of children. Materials and methods: Faecal samples of 330 children from day care centers were evaluated by zinc sulphate flotation and centrifugal sedimentation techniques. The frequencies of detection of parasites by each method were determined and the agreement between the diagnostic techniques was evaluated using the kappa index, with 95% confidence intervals. Results: The faecal flotation in zinc sulphate diagnosed significantly more cases of Trichuris trichiura infection when compared to centrifugal sedimentation (39/330; 11.8% vs. 13/330; 3.9%, p < 0.001), with low diagnostic concordance between methods (kappa=0.264; 95% CI: 0.102-0.427). Moreover, all positive samples for Enterobius vermicularis eggs (n=5) and Strongyloides stercoralis larvae (n=3) were diagnosed only by zinc sulphate. No statistical differences were observed between methods for protozoa identification. Conclusions: The results showed that centrifugal flotation in zinc sulphate solution was significantly more likely to detect light helminths eggs such as those of T. trichiura and E. vermicularis in faeces than the centrifugal sedimentation process.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Inês, E. de J., Pacheco, F. T. F., Pinto, M. C., Mendes, P. S. de A., Jr, H. da C. R., Soares, N. M., & Teixeira, M. C. A. (2016). Concordance between the zinc sulphate flotation and centrifugal sedimentation methods for the diagnosis of intestinal parasites. Biomedica, 36(4), 519–524. https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v36i4.2799

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free