The Desirability of CSR Communication versus Greenhushing in the Hospitality Industry: The Customers’ Perspective

53Citations
Citations of this article
226Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recent literature describes “greenhushing” as the deliberate managerial undercommunicating of corporate social responsibility (CSR) efforts for fear of negative customer opinions and responses. Based on social psychological theory of tourism motivation and cognitive dissonance theory, this research tries to seek evidence that justifies such a practice from the customers’ perspective. In study 1, focus groups reveal that hotels’ CSR communication and awareness creation for environmental issues are desired by consumers. In study 2, an online experiment uncovers that one-way and particularly two-way CSR communication lead to more favorable attitudes toward hotels’ CSR communication and lower intentions to behave unethically, compared with greenhushing. Perceived consumer effectiveness mediates the relationship between type of CSR communication and attitudes toward hotels’ CSR communication as well as intentions to behave unethically. Pro-environmental identity moderates the relationship. Taken together, our research provides little justification for greenhushing in a hospitality context from the customers’ perspective.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ettinger, A., Grabner-Kräuter, S., Okazaki, S., & Terlutter, R. (2021). The Desirability of CSR Communication versus Greenhushing in the Hospitality Industry: The Customers’ Perspective. Journal of Travel Research, 60(3), 618–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520930087

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free