Negotiating Author Fees for Hybrid OA Journals: Library Consortial Leadership

7Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article examines how consortia can engage commercial publishers' hybrid open access (OA) publication programs. The article argues that it is appropriate and necessary for consortia to demonstrate leadership in influencing the information marketplace. Two models for negotiations are examined: 1) “market determinative” strategy, and 2) “consortium discount” strategy, comprised of three variations on existing consortia practices. An examination of the advantages and challenges indicates that the latter would have a greater chance for success. Keys to this conclusion include: establishing linkages between consortium licensing and hybrid titles, cost containment/alignment, and engaging publishers through an integrated model approach.

References Powered by Scopus

The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009

471Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research

367Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A study of open access journals using article processing charges

232Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Opening the black box of scholarly communication funding: A public data infrastructure for financial flows in academic publishing

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Library as a consortium perspective: A systematic literature review

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gillies, S. (2014). Negotiating Author Fees for Hybrid OA Journals: Library Consortial Leadership. Collection Management, 39(4), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2014.935903

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

63%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

25%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 6

38%

Computer Science 4

25%

Arts and Humanities 3

19%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

19%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free