Retinal Vessel Diameters and the Incidence of Gross Proteinuria and Renal Insufficiency in People with Type 1 Diabetes

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Early retinal vessel caliber changes may predict risk of diabetic nephropathy. We examined the association of retinal vessel diameters and the incidence of gross proteinuria and renal insufficiency in a population-based cohort of people with type 1 diabetes (n = 557). Baseline retinal photographs were digitized, and diameters of individual retinal vessels were measured and summarized. Incident cases of gross proteinuria and renal insufficiency were identified over a 16-year period. Larger retinal venular diameter was associated with higher cumulative incidence of gross proteinuria (18.6, 25.4, 37.7, and 50.4%, comparing increasing venular diameter quartiles) and renal insufficiency (10.7, 15.5, 23.2, and 32.8%). After adjusting for age, sex, duration of diabetes, HbA1c levels, baseline retinopathy levels, and other factors, larger retinal venular diameter was associated with an increased risk of gross proteinuria (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.19-1.97, comparing 4th vs. 1st to 3rd quartiles of venular diameter) and renal insufficiency (1.51, 1.05-2.17). Retinal arteriolar diameter was not associated with either gross proteinuria or renal insufficiency. We conclude that in individuals with type 1 diabetes, larger retinal venular diameter is independently associated with the long-term incidence of gross proteinuria and renal insufficiency and may provide additional predictive information regarding risk of nephropathy.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wong, T. Y., Shankar, A., Klein, R., & Klein, B. E. K. (2004). Retinal Vessel Diameters and the Incidence of Gross Proteinuria and Renal Insufficiency in People with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes, 53(1), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.53.1.179

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 27

66%

Researcher 6

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 26

65%

Engineering 7

18%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

13%

Computer Science 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0