More natural models of electoral control by partition

31Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

"Control" studies attempts to set the outcome of elections through the addition, deletion, or partition of voters or candidates. The set of benchmark control types was largely set in the 1992 paper by Bartholdi, Tovey, and Trick that introduced control, and there now is a large literature studying how many of the benchmark types various election systems are vulnerable to, i.e., have polynomial-time attack algorithms for. However, although the longstanding benchmark models of addition and deletion model relatively well the real-world settings that inspire them, the longstanding benchmark models of partition model settings that are arguably quite distant from those they seek to capture. In this paper, we introduce—and for some important cases analyze the complexity of—new partition models that seek to better capture many real-world partition settings. In particular, in many partition set- tings one wants the two parts of the partition to be of (almost) equal size, or is partitioning into more than two parts, or has groups of actors who must be placed in the same part of the partition. Our hope is that having these new partition types will allow studies of control attacks to include such models that more realistically capture many settings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Erdélyi, G., Hemaspaandra, E., & Hemaspaandra, L. A. (2015). More natural models of electoral control by partition. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9346, pp. 396–413). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23114-3_24

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free