Simple algorithms for predicate suggestions using similarity and co-occurrence

21Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

When creating Semantic Web data, users have to make a critical choice for a vocabulary: only through shared vocabularies can meaning be established. A centralised policy prevents terminology divergence but would restrict users needlessly. As seen in collaborative tagging environments, suggestion mechanisms help terminology convergence without forcing users. We introduce two domain-independent algorithms for recommending predicates (RDF statements) about resources, based on statistical dataset analysis. The first algorithm is based on similarity between resources, the second one is based on co-occurrence of predicates. Experimental evaluation shows very promising results: a high precision with relatively high recall in linear runtime performance. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.

References Powered by Scopus

Mining Association Rules Between Sets of Items in Large Databases

13019Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems

4651Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recommender Systems

3011Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Improving the quality of linked data using statistical distributions

161Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Type inference on noisy RDF data

144Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ActiveRDF: Embedding Semantic Web data into object-oriented languages

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oren, E., Gerke, S., & Decker, S. (2007). Simple algorithms for predicate suggestions using similarity and co-occurrence. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4519 LNCS, pp. 160–174). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72667-8_13

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

53%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

20%

Researcher 3

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 14

82%

Mathematics 1

6%

Arts and Humanities 1

6%

Engineering 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free