Comparison of fentanyl versus meperidine as supplements to epidural clonidine-bupivacaine in patients with lower limb orthopedic surgery under combined spinal epidural anesthesia

5Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The analgesic and sedative effect of clonidine explain its common use as adjuvant in regional anesthesia, however the hemodynamic instability associated with its neuroaxial administration is the major drawback. Our study hypothesis is to compare the hemodynamic and analgesic effect of epidural fentanyl in comparison to meperidine when added to clonidine in patients undergoing lower limbs orthopedic surgery using combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Methods: One hundred thirty five ASA physical status I or II patients were recruited for lower limb orthopedic surgery. All received 2mL intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, 10mL epidural 0.25% plain bupivacaine, and 1mL epidural clonidine 2μg/kg (Clonidine group) and then either 1ml fentanyl 25μg (Fentanyl Group) or 1ml meperidine 25mg (Meperidine Group). The quality of surgical anesthesia, incidence of hypotension and bradycardia, intra-operative pain assessment, and onset of postoperative pain, sedation scores and side effects in the postoperative period were recorded. Results: The 1st analgesic requirement in the postoperative period was significantly prolonged in the meperidine group (p=0.001). Significant decrease in the mean arterial blood pressure in fentanyl group was at 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90min (p=0.035, 0.019, 0.027, 0.032 and 0.039) respectively, significant decrease in meperdine group was at 15 and 30min (p=0.038 and 0.043), while in clonidine group a significant decrease was at 15, 30, 45, and 60min (p=0.025, 0.028, 0.036 and 0.042) respectively. Among group changes, the mean arterial blood pressure was significantly higher in meperdine group at 30, 45, 60 and 90min (p=0.007, 0.015, 0.029 and 0.033) respectively. A significant decrease in the heart rate in fentanyl group at 15, 30 and 45min (p=0.035, 0.018 and 0.029), in meperdine group a significant decrease in the heart rate was at 15min (p=0.038), while in clonidine group a significant decrease was at 15, and 30min (p=0.016 and 0.003). Among group changes, the heart rate was significantly higher in meperdine group at 30, 45 and 60min (p=0.021, 0.017 and 0.011). VAS were significantly lower in meperdine group in comparison to fentanyl and clonidine groups at 2h, 3h and 4h post-operative period (p=0.024, 0.001 and 0.039). Conclusion: The combined administration of epidural clonidine and meperidine provided better intraoperative hemodynamics and prolonged postoperative analgesia than epidural clonidine fentanyl combination in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgery. Trial registration: Clinical Trail Registry (Clinicaltrail.gov) NCT 02128451.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yousef, A. A. A. M., Atef, A. M., & Awais, W. M. (2015). Comparison of fentanyl versus meperidine as supplements to epidural clonidine-bupivacaine in patients with lower limb orthopedic surgery under combined spinal epidural anesthesia. BMC Anesthesiology, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0126-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free