Discriminating seismic events using 1D and 2D CNNs: applications to volcanic and tectonic datasets

Abstract

Detecting seismic events, discriminating between different event types, and picking P- and S-wave arrival times are fundamental but laborious tasks in seismology. In response to the ever-increasing volume of seismic observational data, machine learning (ML) methods have been applied to try to resolve these issues. Although it is straightforward to input standard (time-domain) seismic waveforms into ML models, many studies have used time–frequency-domain representations because the frequency components may be effective for discriminating events. However, detailed comparisons of the performances of these two methods are lacking. In this study, we compared the performances of 1D and 2D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in discriminating events in datasets from two different tectonic settings: tectonic tremor and ordinary earthquakes observed at the Nankai trough, and eruption signals and other volcanic earthquakes at Sakurajima volcano. We found that the 1D and 2D CNNs performed similarly in these applications. Half of the misclassified events were misassigned the same labels in both CNNs, implying that the CNNs learned similar features inherent to the input signals and thus misclassified them similarly. Because the first convolutional layer of a 1D CNN applies a set of finite impulse response (FIR) filters to the input seismograms, these filters are thought to extract signals effective for discriminating events in the first step. Therefore, because our application was the discrimination of signals dominated by low- and high-frequency components, we tested which frequency components were effective for signal discriminations based on the filter responses alone. We found that the FIR filters comprised high-pass and low-pass filters with cut-off frequencies around 7–9 Hz, frequencies at which the magnitude relations of the input signal classes change. This difference in the power of high- and low-frequency components proved essential for correct signal classifications in our dataset. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]