Comparing strategies for search space boundaries violation in PSO

4Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper, we choose to compare four methods for controlling particle position when it violates the search space boundaries and the impact on the performance of Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm (PSO). The methods are: hard borders, soft borders, random position and spherical universe. The goal is to compare the performance of these methods for the classical version of PSO and popular modification - the Attractive and Repulsive Particle Swarm Optimization (ARPSO). The experiments were carried out according to CEC benchmark rules and statistically evaluated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kadavy, T., Pluhacek, M., Viktorin, A., & Senkerik, R. (2017). Comparing strategies for search space boundaries violation in PSO. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10246 LNAI, pp. 655–664). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59060-8_59

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free