Study Design: Retrospective Cohort Study Objective: Spinal fusion, specifically constructs connected to pelvic bones, has been consistently reported as a predisposing factor to sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain. The aim of this study is to compare SIJ outcomes in patients with constructs to the pelvis following instrumentation vs instrumentation plus fusion of the SIJ. Methods: Data of study subjects was extracted from a prospectively maintained database as well as retrospectively collected from records at a tertiary academic medical center in the United States between 2018 and 2020. Results: A cohort of 103 patients was divided into 2 groups: 65 in Group 1 [S2AI screw without fusion device] and 38 in Group 2 [S2AI screw with fusion device]. None of the patients in Group 2 developed postoperative SIJ pain compared to 44.6% in Group 1. Sacroiliac joint fusion occurred in all Group 2 but none of Group 1 patients. The postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for lower extremity (LE) pain (.8 vs.5; P =.03) and postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (18.7 vs 14.2; P
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
CITATION STYLE
Noureldine, M. H. A., Farooq, J., Kumar, J. I., Pressman, E., Coughlin, E., Mhaskar, R., & Alikhani, P. (2023). Improved Outcomes with Concurrent Instrumentation and Fusion of the Sacroiliac Joint in Patients with Long Lumbosacral Constructs. Global Spine Journal, 13(7), 2001–2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682211069095