A comparative study on the performances of flat plate and evacuated tube collectors deployable in domestic solar water heating systems in different climate areas

39Citations
Citations of this article
110Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Using TRNSYS software, a comparison of the energy performances of flat-plate collectors (FPCs) and evacuated-tube collectors (ETCs) in domestic solar water heating systems located in different climate areas was carried out in order to ascertain solar energy utilization. Investigations were carried out on single FPCs and ETCs and also for strings of four panels connected in series. Tests were conducted using simulations for water as heat transfer fluid with a fixed fluid flow rate and varying the temperature of the collector's returning fluid. The maximum power peak decreases with the increase in the inlet temperature of the fluid to the collector in the FPC. The maximum outlet temperature of the FPC is higher than the ETC, most of the time. The evacuated-tube collector performs better only in cold climate areas. Simulations suggest that the use of the FPC is strongly discouraged in cold climatic areas due to thermal losses, whereas the ETC works well with reduced dispersion of heat. In warm seasons, on the contrary, the FPC takes advantage of the high environmental temperature which heats the fluid. The maximum yearly outlet temperature and useful power peak predicted in different climatic areas were investigated by varying the temperature of the fluid inlet fed to the two strings of four FPCs and ETCs. In all cases, the outlet temperature is higher in the ETC technology.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Greco, A., Gundabattini, E., Gnanaraj, D. S., & Masselli, C. (2020). A comparative study on the performances of flat plate and evacuated tube collectors deployable in domestic solar water heating systems in different climate areas. Climate, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/CLI8060078

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25010203040

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

57%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

13%

Researcher 3

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 25

68%

Energy 8

22%

Materials Science 2

5%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0