A critical review of priority setting in the health sector: The methodology of the 1993 World Development Report

63Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The 1993 World Development Report, investing in Health, suggests policies to assist governments of developing countries in improving the health of their populations. A new methodology to improve government spending is introduced. Epidemiological and economic analyses form the basis for a global priority setting exercise, leading to a recommended essential public health and clinical services package for low- and middle-income countries. Ministries of Health in many countries have expressed an interest in designing a national package of essential health services, using the methodology. Given the apparent importance attached to the study and its far reaching potential consequences, this article provides an overview of the method, the main issues and problems in estimating the burden of disease as well as the cost-effectiveness of interventions. Strengths and weaknesses in the databases, value judgements and assumptions are identified, leading to a critical analysis of the validity of the priority setting exercise on the global level.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paalman, M., Bekedam, H., Hawken, L., & Nyheim, D. (1998). A critical review of priority setting in the health sector: The methodology of the 1993 World Development Report. Health Policy and Planning, 13(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/13.1.13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free