Causal Explanation and Historical Meaning: How to Solve the Problem of the Specific Historical Relation Between Events

2Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

History is no mere chronicle of events. This insight of Arthur C. Danto’s (often misunderstood) discussion of the concept of history implies that the historical meaning of a past event can change in the course of time – simply because of what happens afterwards. If we hold, however, that history has a real structure and that the historical meaning of past events is determined by the causal and temporal structure of these events, then we have to be able to show how the historical meaning of past events can be causally explained. And how can this be shown without presupposing the highly controversial thesis of backward causation? After discussing Danto’s thesis at some length, I argue first very generally in favour of a counterfactual analysis of causality and, second, that an expansion or revision of this analysis can solve the problem of this specific historical relation between events.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gerber, D. (2014). Causal Explanation and Historical Meaning: How to Solve the Problem of the Specific Historical Relation Between Events. In Synthese Library (Vol. 367, pp. 197–210). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7563-3_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free