Application of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to projecting cancer incidence and mortality

81Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Projections based on incidence and mortality data collected by cancer registries are important for estimating current rates in the short term, and public health planning in the longer term. Classical approaches are dependent on questionable parametric assumptions. We implement a Bayesian age-period-cohort model, allowing the inclusion of prior belief concerning the smoothness of the parameters. The model is described by a directed acyclic graph. Computations are carried out by using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods (implemented in BUGS) in which the degree of smoothing is learnt from the data. Results and convergence diagnostics are discussed for an exemplary data set. We then compare the Bayesian projections with other methods in a range of situations to demonstrate its flexibility and robustness.

References Powered by Scopus

Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences

12196Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bayesian computation and stochastic systems

778Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Models for temporal variation in cancer rates. II: Age–period–cohort models

761Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Current burden and future projections

1011Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Applied Bayesian Modelling

477Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Projecting the future burden of cancer: Bayesian age–period–cohort analysis with integrated nested Laplace approximations

224Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bray, I. (2002). Application of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to projecting cancer incidence and mortality. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C: Applied Statistics, 51(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9876.00260

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

30%

Researcher 7

30%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Mathematics 10

59%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

18%

Engineering 2

12%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free