Entrenching positions? The dynamics of Brexit negotiations mirrored in British, Irish, and EU executives’ speeches

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Brexit constitutes an unprecedented crisis for the European Union and its member states. Three affected parties–the United Kingdom, the EU and Ireland–worked hard to protect their interests, making the negotiations difficult, especially regarding the Irish land border. While the key interests of the negotiating partners are clear, it is less known how and to what extent these interests were communicated by the political representatives of the three countries. We approach Brexit as a critical juncture and base our work on the framing literature. We use a unique dataset including political speeches made by EU Commission members and the UK and Irish government officials during a period from January 2016 until January 2020, relying on the innovative automated text analysis approach of keyword-assisted topic modelling. Beyond insisting on their interests, communication reflects the socio-political context. We find indications that speeches reflect the flow of the negotiations. Finally, our analysis reveals topics that largely flew under the media radar, such as research and protection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eisele, O., & Hajdinjak, S. (2023). Entrenching positions? The dynamics of Brexit negotiations mirrored in British, Irish, and EU executives’ speeches. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 31(3), 1027–1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2022.2109605

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free