Task-irrelevant features in visual working memory influence covert attention: Evidence from a partial report task

6Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Selecting a target based on a representation in visual working memory (VWM) affords biasing covert attention towards objects with memory-matching features. Recently, we showed that even task-irrelevant features of a VWM template bias attention. Specifically, when participants had to saccade to a cued shape, distractors sharing the cue’s search-irrelevant color captured the eyes. While a saccade always aims at one target location, multiple locations can be attended covertly. Here, we investigated whether covert attention is captured similarly as the eyes. In our partial report task, each trial started with a shape-defined search cue, followed by a fixation cross. Next, two colored shapes, each including a letter, appeared left and right from fixation, followed by masks. The letter inside that shape matching the preceding cue had to be reported. In Experiment 1, either target, distractor, both, or no object matched the cue’s irrelevant color. Target-letter reports were most frequent in target-match trials and least frequent in distractor-match trials. Irrelevant cue and target color never matched in Experiment 2. Still, participants reported the distractor more often to the target’s disadvantage, when cue and distractor color matched. Thus, irrelevant features of a VWM template can influence covert attention in an involuntarily object-based manner when searching for trial-wise varying targets.

References Powered by Scopus

Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention

6497Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Computational modelling of visual attention

3902Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions

3208Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Object features reinstated from episodic memory guide attentional selection

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Oculomotor capture by search-irrelevant features in visual working memory: on the crucial role of target–distractor similarity

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Attentional Guidance by Irrelevant Features Depends on Their Successful Encoding Into Working Memory

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Foerster, R. M., & Schneider, W. X. (2019). Task-irrelevant features in visual working memory influence covert attention: Evidence from a partial report task. Vision (Switzerland), 3(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/vision3030042

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

81%

Researcher 2

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 14

78%

Neuroscience 2

11%

Design 1

6%

Social Sciences 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free