Yaks versus Tweets: Sentiment discrepancy during a social crisis

5Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

People use social networks to get current information, express their emotions and ideas, and connect with others. During a social crisis, there is a heightened value in using a social network to get information. Unfortunately, using a social network during a social crisis also provides fertile grounds for uncertainties and rapid dissemination of misinformation. Currently, there are multiple types of social networks including traditional and anonymous social networks. This research considers the differences between these two types of social networks. During the ‘Concerned Student 1950’, a student activist group at the University of Missouri, crisis at the University of Missouri, we captured users’ messages on two distinct anonymous and traditional social networks. Through sentiment analysis of datasets from Twitter and Yik Yak, we find that people express less total sentiment and more extremity on anonymous social networks. Results show extremity and length positively influence engagement, but total sentiment negatively influence engagement. These findings provide guidance for developers, law enforcement, and social network users.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koohikamali, M., & Gerhart, N. (2018). Yaks versus Tweets: Sentiment discrepancy during a social crisis. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 2018-January, pp. 1789–1796). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2018.225

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free