What might be the requirements of a strongly reflective critical and constructive approach to the issues at the core of this volume's motivations? This, in a world that influential pedagogical institutions have come to so frequently gloss with such images as 'post-modern - colonial, -industrial', or of 'globalisation and multi-culturalism,' 'consumer-society,' 'risk/reflexive-society'? What might such an approach to relationships between 'archaeology and the tourism and heritage industries' look like in a world of 'mass production, replication, simulation, and consumption' (to use the editor, Ian Russell's (this volume) terms? There are two ways in which I will make an attempt at these questions in what follows. © 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
CITATION STYLE
Koerner, S. (2006). Towards archaeologies of memories of the past and planning futures: Engaging the Faustian Bargain of “crises of interpretation.” In Images, Representations and Heritage: Moving beyond Modern Approaches to Archaeology (pp. 187–220). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-32216-7_8
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.