On “Overspecification” in Medieval Mathematical Diagrams

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In a recent paper[1], Christián Carman advanced a tentative explanation for “overspecification” in medieval mathematical diagrams. Carman argues that the original (“correct”) diagrams were corrupted, presumably through incompetent copyists, while preparing the initial copies—often before the tenth consecutive copy. The diagrams then stabilized in an overspecified form and resisted further changes, sometimes for centuries of copies thereafter. I feel hesitant about this hypothesis for several reasons: (1) it assumes that the first Greek diagrams were essentially identical to modern diagrams; (2) pre-modern overspecification is ubiquitous and is rarely reversed; (3) the hypothesis ignores differing traditions of perspective; (4) the informal tests used to support the hypothesis do not precisely mirror the medieval copyist’s activity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Young, G. (2020). On “Overspecification” in Medieval Mathematical Diagrams. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 12169 LNAI, pp. 3–9). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54249-8_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free