Terrorism and the internet: How dangerous is online radicalization?

14Citations
Citations of this article
98Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This work is concerned with the extent and magnitude of threat related to online radicalization in the context of terrorist acts and related offending. Online influences have been depicted as major drivers for the propagation and adoption of extremist ideologies, which often contain an element of collective grievance, and subsequent acts of violence. This is most pronounced in the discussion of so-called lone actor terrorism, but extends to all forms of extremist offending, and beyond. The present work situates online radicalization leading to terrorist acts within the wider context of grievance-based beliefs and attitudes. Further, it addresses current positions and debates surrounding the relevance and mechanisms of online radicalization in terrorist offending. Recent evidence from quantitative studies is reviewed to estimate prevalence of online radicalization and the level of threat that results from it. This is followed by a discussion of plausible, but opposing, interpretations of the estimates presented. While online radicalization does occur, with and without reference to offline processes, the resulting threat is not overly high. This assessment, however, refers to the present only and is unlikely to hold for the future, given the general growth and acceleration of online activity among terrorist actors.

References Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Binder, J. F., & Kenyon, J. (2022). Terrorism and the internet: How dangerous is online radicalization? Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997390

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

64%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

24%

Researcher 2

8%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 10

37%

Arts and Humanities 7

26%

Psychology 6

22%

Computer Science 4

15%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 7
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 13

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0