Since the late 1980's the productivity of monocultures vs. mixed-species forests has been the subject of studies by forest managers and ecologists. Mixed plantations have been established in different proportions to determine if mixtures could provide greater yields and more benefits than monocultures of the component species, as well as to understand if they could be an interesting economic option. An experimental design trial was set up in the north of Portugal in a replacement series with pure and mixed Castanea sativa Mill. and Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco. The objective of this study was to assess growth dynamics and compare the aboveground biomass and net primary production of the two species in pure and mixed treatments in proportions 1:1 and 1:3. The growth was measured at 7, 11, 15, 17, 19, 27 and 28 years after planting and aboveground net primary production was estimated at age 28. As a component of the mixed treatments, P. menziesii exhibited greater height, diameter and aboveground biomass than C. sativa. Relative yield total indicated a higher productivity in the mixtures compared with the pure treatments. Early in the development, pure treatments and mixtures had similar aboveground biomass per hectare, but later the mixtures showed higher yield than pure treatments. The mixture productivity increase through time appears to be the result of both canopy stratification and better use of site resources. The aboveground net primary production was also higher in mixed than in the pure treatments. © SISEF.
CITATION STYLE
Nunes, L., Gower, S. T., Monteiro, M. L., Lopes, D., & Rego, F. C. (2014). Growth dynamics and productivity of pure and mixed Castanea Sativa Mill. and Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco plantations in Northern Portugal. IForest, 7(2), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1087-007
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.