Sustainable flood risk management encompasses the implementation of nature-based solutions to mitigate flood risk. These measures include the establishment of land use types with a high (e.g., forest patches) or low (e.g., sealed surfaces) water retention and infiltration capacity at strategic locations in the catchment. This paper presents an approach for assessing the relative impact of such land use changes on economic flood damages and associated risk. This spatially explicit approach integrates a reference situation, a flood damage model, and a rainfall-runoff model considering runoff re-infiltration and propagation to determine relative flood risk mitigation or increment related to the implementation of land use change scenarios. The applicability of the framework is illustrated for a 4800g€¯ha undulating catchment in the region of Flanders, Belgium, by assessing the afforestation of 187.5g€¯ha (3.9g€¯%), located mainly in the valleys, and sealing of 187.5g€¯ha, situated mainly at higher elevations. These scenarios result in a risk reduction of 57g€¯% (EURg€¯100g€¯000) for the afforestation scenario and a risk increment of <1g€¯% (EURg€¯g1/4g€¯500) for the sealing scenario.
CITATION STYLE
Gabriels, K., Willems, P., & Van Orshoven, J. (2022). A comparative flood damage and risk impact assessment of land use changes. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 22(2), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-395-2022
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.