A qualitative investigation of uninsured patient and primary care provider perspectives on specialty care eConsults

2Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Uninsured and underinsured patients face specialty care access disparities that prevent them from obtaining the care they need and negatively impact their health and well-being. We aimed to understand how making specialty care electronic consultations (eConsults) available at a multi-site Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in central Texas affected uninsured patients’ care-seeking experiences and impacted their ability to receive the needed care. Methods: We used concepts from Ecological Systems Theory to examine individual, interpersonal, organization-level, social, and health policy environment factors that impacted patients’ access to specialty care and the use of eConsults. We conducted thematic analysis of semi-structured, qualitative interviews with patients about seeking specialty care while uninsured and with uninsured patients and FQHC PCPs about their experience using eConsults to obtain specialists’ recommendations. Results: Patients and PCPs identified out-of-pocket cost, stigma, a paucity of local specialists willing to see uninsured patients, time and difficulty associated with travel and transportation to specialty visits, and health policy limitations as barriers to obtaining specialty care. Benefits of using eConsults for uninsured patients included minimizing/avoiding financial stress, expanding access to care, expanding scope of primary care, and expediting access to specialists. Concerns about the model included patients’ limited understanding of eConsults, concern about cost, and worry whether eConsults could appropriately meet their specialty needs. Conclusions: Findings suggest that eConsults delivered in a primary care FQHC addressed uninsured patients’ specialty care access concerns. They helped to address financial and geographic barriers, provided time and cost savings to patients, expanded FQHC PCPs’ knowledge and care provision options, and allowed patients to receive more care in primary care.

References Powered by Scopus

Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

6609Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Contribution of primary care to health systems and health

3567Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stigma in health facilities: Why it matters and how we can change it

497Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Comprehensive insights into a decade-long journey: The evolution, impact, and human factors of an asynchronous telemedicine program for diabetic retinopathy screening in Pennsylvania, United States

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A comparison of floating catchment area parameters with applications to a dataset of clinics enrolled in a statewide child and adolescent psychiatric consultation program

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bifulco, L., Grzejszczak, L., Velez, I., Angelocci, T., & Anderson, D. (2023). A qualitative investigation of uninsured patient and primary care provider perspectives on specialty care eConsults. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10086-6

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

50%

Researcher 3

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

40%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

20%

Environmental Science 1

20%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free