Performance-based publisher ratings and the visibility/impact of books: Small fish in a big pond, or big fish in a small pond?

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study compares publisher ratings to the visibility and impact of individual books, based on a 2017 data set from three Nordic performance-based research funding systems (PRFS) (Denmark, Norway, and Finland). Although there are Journal Impact Factors ( JIFs) for journals, there is no similar indicator for book publishers. National publisher lists are used instead to account for the general “quality” of books, leading to institutional rewards. But, just as the JIF is not recommended as a proxy for the “citedness” of a paper, a publisher rating is also not recommended as a proxy for the impact of an individual book. We introduce a small fish in a big pond versus big fish in a small pond metaphor, where a “fish” is a book and “the pond” represents its publishing house. We investigate how books fit on this metaphorical fish and pond continuum, using WorldCat holdings (visibility) and Google Scholar citations (impact), and test other variables to determine their predictive value with respect to these two indicators. Our statistics show that publisher levels do not have predictive value when other variables are held constant. This has implications for PRFS and book evaluations in general, as well as ongoing developments related to a newly proposed international publisher registry.

References Powered by Scopus

The history and meaning of the journal impact factor

1969Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A review of the literature on citation impact indicators

863Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services

752Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Uses of the Journal Impact Factor in national journal rankings in China and Europe

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Why does library holding format really matter for book impact assessment?: Modelling the relationship between citations and altmetrics with print and electronic holdings

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mapping scholarly books: library metadata and research assessment

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zuccala, A. A., Pölönen, J., Guns, R., Røeggen, V., Kulczycki, E., Bruun, K., & Savolainen, E. (2021). Performance-based publisher ratings and the visibility/impact of books: Small fish in a big pond, or big fish in a small pond? Quantitative Science Studies, 2(2), 588–615. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00134

Readers over time

‘21‘23‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

60%

Computer Science 2

40%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0