A Comparison of DESI-MS and LC-MS for the Lipidomic Profiling of Human Cancer Tissue

27Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this study, we make a direct comparison between desorption electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (DESI-MS) and ultraperformance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESI-MS) platforms for the profiling of glycerophospholipid (GPL) species in esophageal cancer tissue. In particular, we studied the similarities and differences in the range of GPLs detected and the congruency of their relative abundances as detected by each analytical platform. The main differences between mass spectra of the two modalities were found to be associated with the variance in adduct formation of common GPLs, rather than the presence of different GPL species. Phosphatidylcholines as formate adducts in UPLC-ESI-MS accounted for the majority of differences in negative ion mode and alkali metal adducts of phosphatidylcholines in DESI-MS for positive ion mode. Comparison of the relative abundance of GPLs, normalized to a common peak, revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.70 (P < 0.001). The GPL profile detected by DESI-MS is congruent to UPLC-ESI-MS, which reaffirms the role of DESI-MS for lipidomic profiling and a potential premise for quantification.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abbassi-Ghadi, N., Jones, E. A., Gomez-Romero, M., Golf, O., Kumar, S., Huang, J., … Takats, Z. (2016). A Comparison of DESI-MS and LC-MS for the Lipidomic Profiling of Human Cancer Tissue. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 27(2), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13361-015-1278-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free